Display:
Or arguably put the money into training and enterprise initiatives for the workers? That kind of money could potentially make for a decent redundancy payment and some good seed loans for small businesses in affected areas?

(I say this because giving GM to the workers seems to me to be a poisoned chalice given the sheer over-capacity in global car manufacturing.)

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Wed May 3rd, 2006 at 07:20:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If GM goes bust the grounds may be redeveloped for residential/commercial use or something, and the workers will get zilch. If the workers decide they want to liquidate the company and reap the benefits from the redevelopment, more power to them. And Joelado has this theory that GM has all these workable blueprints for cool hybrids or fully electrical vehicles shelved away since the 1970's...

I just read the health and pension liabilities of GM are 4 times its market capitalization. Why not capitalize the liabilities and give the workers 80% of the resulting company? Or something like that, I'm not big on company finance, but I'm sure someone can work out the details.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed May 3rd, 2006 at 07:24:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series