Altogether, color me skeptical that anything good is going to happen to the middle classes in the near future.
This is a delicate operation, to say the least. We are in the midst of what could well be the mother of all liquidity cycles. Courtesy of an extraordinary monetary accommodation, financial markets have enjoyed open-ended support from central banks. This has been a key role reversal for the tough guys who are supposed to take away the "punch bowl" just when the party gets good. Given the power of this liquidity cycle -- evidenced not just by asset bubbles in major markets but also by an extraordinary compression of spreads on risky assets such as emerging-market debt and more traditional credit instruments -- a serious monetary tightening could prove devastating for financial markets and increasingly wealth-dependent economies. As long as inflation remains low, however, the authorities can set their sights on the more benign target of neutrality. The latest downside surprise on the US inflation front -- another weaker-than-expected increase in the all-important Employment Cost Index -- provides support for that strategy. Despite a tightening labor market, compensation growth for civilian workers slowed to just 2.8% in the 12 months ending March 2006 -- down one full percentage point from the pace two years ago. This is yet another example of the power of the global labor arbitrage and good reason to believe that central banks can stay focused on the goal of normalization rather than tightening.
Gaaa... guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
Ain't the "new economy" fun... In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes