Display:
I'd ask "can you run another test to make sure I have the disease", and "is that the most successful treatment that we know"?

Both are experimental questions.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jun 21st, 2006 at 11:00:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And therein lies the problem. Economics, like most social science, is hampered by it's inability to conduct real experiments and the 'squishy' nature of the variables it measures. As a social scientist I'm of course sympathetic, but that just means I understand how tentative all these 'findings' really are.

Social Science, especially economics, is collectively at the point where physics was while Newton lived, or where Biology was when Darwin made his first trip on the Beagle. We've found some empirical correlations. We have a few theories that seem internally consistent. Do we have great working models of real economies or real social systems? No. We know more about the weather.  

No raindrop believes itself responsible for the flood that follows.

by Benito (haplo1998 at yahoo) on Thu Jun 22nd, 2006 at 01:12:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series