Take inflaation's most convenient measure -- the US Consumer Price Index. How many economists agree this is a good measure? What does it include? What does it leave out? Non-experimental physical sciences can advance at a faster rate because it is clear the things they measure are fairly easily measured constants.
I have yet to touch or measure 'utility'. No raindrop believes itself responsible for the flood that follows.
I think there's a question that economists are taught not to ask, which is 'In whose experience?'
Inflation is supposedly an objective measure of - something. But it will be experienced differently on Wall St, by the middle classes, and by a poor person in New Orleans.
Which of these different experiences is considered the most relevant and important 'on aggregate, and why?
Some personal rants at Bernard Salanie's blog