Display:
for an explanation as to why the enormous US military-industrial complex is needed.

What purpose does it serve? Whose purpose does it serve?

And while I'm about it, would it be necessary if people took some time to understand other cultures instead of picking up the nearest hammer?

As I recall from the millions and millions of hours of US television, say for instance after the Tehran hostage crisis - there were probably less than a 1000 US citizens who could say what the 5 pillars of Islam were. I doubt if it is more than few thousand now, unless they are Islamic.

This failure to understand other cultures and other beliefs is at the very heart of US problems IMHO. It is a failure that starts at the top, spreads out through the media, and disinforms the citizenry such that when they come to vote, they don't understand the context in which they vote.

Some decent arguments to rebut these assertions would be most welcome. We Europeans may be wrong. But at least we understand that justice is only served when the prosecution is balanced by a defence. By all the facts. If we only ever listened to prosecutors, we would hang everybody. Draw and quarter them too, most likely.

But we don't. We try to make balanced judgements which are, admittedly, very difficult in the rapidly changing multi-cultural context of Europe. At least we try, and we are changing ourselves in the process. Defenders of the faiths. Plural.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Jun 20th, 2006 at 01:43:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There is always War Is A Racket.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 20th, 2006 at 02:33:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
thanks for that! an amazing link...

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Jun 20th, 2006 at 03:08:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's hard to take your comments seriously when you pose them in this manner:
As I read this debate, no one has yet challenged the notion of why one should need a large military, even if it is democratically decided to have such a thing.

Either it is, as Colman surmises, a fix for the unemployment figures, or it is, as I surmise, absofuckinglutely megolamaniac stupidity, unfit for the 3rd millennium.

I'm not trying to be sarcastic or snarky with the following comments, but you go in in your later comment to say
And while I'm about it, would it be necessary if people took some time to understand other cultures instead of picking up the nearest hammer?
But, surely if you understand the American culture at all, you would not postulate that Americans are choosing from the two options you propose above.

I hope that your options are meant to be sarcastic and snarky.  And if you really want a discussion of this, you can lay out a starting point that shows more insight into America (which I think you have based on other posts of yours) than these comments show.  If your above statements reflect what you believe, I don't think either of us should waste our time.

by wchurchill on Tue Jun 20th, 2006 at 07:21:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series