Display:
I could have, but I am not convinced the situation is worse now than it was under the Taliban.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 20th, 2006 at 04:36:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Worse is debatable and depends on locality (e.g. Kabul vs. everywhere else), but the question is whether you can see any improvement.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Jun 20th, 2006 at 04:41:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, improvement I can't see any.

guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 20th, 2006 at 04:46:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As for the argument that it actually worsened (chiefly because Taliban law-and-order was replaced with warlord lawlessness), I best let Afghan women make the argument -- three links to RAWA stories:



*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Jun 20th, 2006 at 05:00:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I am very skeptical about all this.

It's not because the Afghanistan constitution enshrines "equality of the sexes" that equality exists. My cousin (mentioned previously on ET) who came back from his first tour of duty told me that the only females he saw in half a year spent walking around among Afghans as a translator, were little girls. No women anywhere to be seen, except in burkhas on some occasions.

Ok, maybe many women are now in parliament, but my guess is that parliament is mainly (if not only) composed of Western-educated men to start with, so it's not a revolution per se. And writing the law is not the same thing as applying it in warlord territory.

by Alex in Toulouse on Tue Jun 20th, 2006 at 05:12:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series