Display:
So UK has 2.3 time less official unemployment on this age group (3.6% vs 8.5%). All of this with only 1.5% more employed people. This is to say about all of the difference in unemployment comes from the UK government convincing people they're inactive and not unemployed (in various ways) whereas the FR government wasn't as successful at this game. 1-0 for Blair. See the "willing to work" figure below for the so-called "inactive".
by Laurent GUERBY on Sun Jun 25th, 2006 at 05:01:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Since part time employment is 13.4% of employment in FR  vs 24.1% in UK, this makes the 1.5% difference in employment even less impressive as a 10 point difference is about 7 points of the whole population (if we assume 25-54 has more or less the same part time share as 15-64).
by Laurent GUERBY on Mon Jun 26th, 2006 at 07:28:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series