Due to reactor physics it "only" contains 60 times as much energy as the original U-235.
What do you mean "contains 60 times as much energy" than U-235? In what sense? The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom - William Blake
For an (oldish) breeder assessment see "Nuclear Power and Energy Security: A Revised Strategy for Japan (1998)" specifically chpt. 4. AFAIK the problems it highlights are still problems today (but I could be wrong).
For a more general skeptical view of nuclear (fission) power in general see "WHY NUCLEAR POWER CANNOT BE A MAJOR ENERGY SOURCE"... The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom - William Blake