Display:
You say
It has recently been revealed that he attempted to assassinate West Germany's chancellor Konrad Adenauer in 1952 over disagreement on how the German compensation for the Holocaust should be paid.
and reference the Guardian article  This statement says this as though it were fact.  But the Guardian article shows it is disputed.  First the bombmaker himself has said there was no intent to assasinate Adenauer:
Although the plot was "dilettantish", the bomb sent to Adenauer was "extremely sophisticated", Sietz said: "Sudit was an expert bomb maker. The bomb proved impossible to defuse."

Excerpts from Mr Sudit's privately printed memoir, including his own version of events written after Begin's death in 1992 - which were passed to the Israeli daily paper Haaretz, reveal that Begin knew of the plans to assassinate Adenauer and that he had even initiated meetings to promote the operation.

But Mr Sudit told Haaretz this week: "The intent was not to hit Adenauer but to rouse the international media. It was clear to all of us there was no chance the package would reach Adenauer."

Begin's camp says the story is not true, according to the Guardian article.  

This week Begin's personal secretary, Yehiel Kadishai, and Herzl Makov, the director of the Menachem Begin Heritage Centre, in Jerusalem, told Haaretz that they knew nothing of the assassination attempt, which at the time had been played down by both Israel and Germany........ His own family had perished in the Holocaust. In 1978 the Polish born leader he received the Nobel Peace prize for his peace negotiations with Egypt's president at the time, Anwar Sadat.
It's certainly fine if you believe one version of events, and choose to argue the accuracy of that version.  IMO, presenting your version as fact, and not even mentioning the facts are disputed is not intellectually honest.  And it's certainly not "Let us dig a little deeper into the history, shall we?".
by wchurchill on Sun Jul 23rd, 2006 at 01:38:24 PM EST
but there is no disputing that Begin was involved with the King David Hotel incident, so it's not like they are destroying his reputation or anything.
by manon (m@gmail.com) on Sun Jul 23rd, 2006 at 01:43:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
  1. It is of little significance that they didn't believe the bomb will reach Adenauer. They clearly believed it will reach someone, and thus lead to that rousing the international media. Which it did: one man was murdered. Do you think this murder is a lewsser crime than had Adenauer been killed?

  2. If we are at getting precise, "they knew nothing of the assassination attempt" is not the same as "it is not true".

  3. You are effectively claiming Mr. Sudit is a liar, something Begin's partisans awoided (see point 2). Do you dare to make this accusation explicit?

Thanks for playing.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sun Jul 23rd, 2006 at 02:12:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The way I see it, even if one chooses to believe Sudit on this point, if you send an indefusible bomb to a head of gov't, then you are at least prepared for the eventuality that it may reach him and kill him, even if you know the probability is slight. It's a bit like trying to snipe him off from a distant rooftop, knowing you are most likely to hit his security detail, which is also fine for your purposes. Morally it doesn't make much of a difference even if one stipulates that killing the head of gov't is somewhat worse.

And of course, as you note, this:

This week Begin's personal secretary, Yehiel Kadishai, and Herzl Makov, the director of the Menachem Begin Heritage Centre, in Jerusalem, told Haaretz that they knew nothing of the assassination attempt, which at the time had been played down by both Israel and Germany.

...does not make the story 'disputed', so there is no substance to wchurchill's charge of int'l dishonesty.


The world's northernmost desert wind.

by Sirocco (sirocco2005ATgmail.com) on Sun Jul 23rd, 2006 at 02:40:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
32 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
19 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
8 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

Recent Diaries
Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
19 comments

Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
32 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
8 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Answers to the Renewable Energy Consultation
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 7

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Mismatch with the Natural Gas Market
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3
22 comments

The Future of Economics
by ARGeezer - Feb 2
191 comments

Desert Island Discs - Helen's distortions
by Helen - Jan 31
48 comments

Gorila
by DoDo - Jan 29
14 comments

Rail News Blogging #7
by DoDo - Jan 29
15 comments

Obama's State Of The Union: LQD
by Crazy Horse - Jan 25
74 comments

Democracy Technology
by gmoke - Jan 24
1 comment

The Hydrogen dream
by Luis de Sousa - Jan 24
49 comments

ET Paris Meet-Up 2012 (2 UPDATE)
by afew - Jan 23
113 comments

More Diaries...
Occasional Series