Display:
Just from a common sense point of view, the idea that a tribe has a claim on land that it came from two millennia ago is irrational at best and unique in history. I can't think of any other culture that uses events from Roman and pre-Roman times to justify political strategy today. It makes as much sense as the UK demanding reparations from Scandinavia for the Viking landings, or from Italy for the Roman conquest.

Throw in the religion stuff, and the claim is comparable to Greece claiming the Turkish Mediterranean coast on the basis of The Illiad.

The world's northernmost desert wind.

by Sirocco (sirocco2005ATgmail.com) on Sun Jul 23rd, 2006 at 09:38:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Not really the same. But the question I have is what you think follows from this analysis. Accepting for argument sake that the Israeli claim to Israel is invalid, what do you propose? Should the Yemeni Jews go back to their dhmini lives in Yemen, under Muslim religious control, forbidden to own land or ride a donkey? Should the Ashkenazi Jews wander back into the EU and get their ancestral homes back?
by citizen k (sansracine yahoo.fr) on Mon Jul 24th, 2006 at 05:36:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series