Display:
Okay, let's talk about international law. Most of the so-called "international law" being broken by Israel are racist UN GA resolutions that apply to Israel and Israel ALONE. That's not international law.

There have been rulings by international courts that have no jurisdiction over Israel, and that Israel wasn't even represented at because of this lack of juridiction. That is not international law either.

Resolutions 242 and 338 require Israeli withdrawl AFTER a negotiated settlement of SOME of the land. There was no territorial despute with Lebanon, Egypt and Jordan GOT their land back, and the Palestinians and Syria didn't negotiate in good faith.

by messy on Mon Jul 24th, 2006 at 09:55:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Not racist: they apply to a state, not an ethnic group.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Jul 24th, 2006 at 10:01:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
yeah, racist because the objections to Israel are due to it's ethnic makeup.
by messy on Mon Jul 24th, 2006 at 03:41:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
you're just playing the victim
by manon (m@gmail.com) on Mon Jul 24th, 2006 at 03:56:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Prove it.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Jul 24th, 2006 at 04:16:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
read UN security council resolutions 249, 250 and 251.
by messy on Mon Jul 24th, 2006 at 09:59:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series