Display:
The context is what kcurie posted yesterday (and what no Western media outlet will have the mind to connect):

Palestinian groups agree deal for return of Israeli

Palestinian factions, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad, have agreed to stop firing rockets at Israel and to free a captured Israeli soldier in a deal brokered by Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president.

The deal, agreed on Sunday, is to halt the rocket attacks in return for a cessation of Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip, and to release Corporal Gilad Shalit, the Israeli soldier captured on June 25, in exchange for the freeing of Palestinian prisoners at some point in the future.

An adviser to Mr Abbas told the Guardian that all Palestinian politicians were united on the need to free the Israeli soldier and stop all violence in Gaza, but the obstacles were the Israeli government and the Hamas leadership in Damascus.



*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 09:12:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I did see it mentioned in one of the stories about the tanks moving into Gaza this morning, but now I can't find which one.

It was a passing reference, something like: "tanks moved in, in spite of Abbas's peace proposal".

Otherwise, it seems to be being ignored. Abbas is regarded as a nobody. If Israel sincerely wants a responsible Palestinian interlocutor, why don't they pick up on this proposal? Ignoring it only serves to terminally weaken Abbas's position.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 09:58:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series