Display:
The US issue has already been commented, so now look at this.

#5   Germany 2,677,000 barrels per day

Big economy, reasonably efficient, let's use it as a benchmark.    

#4   Russia 2,800,000 barrels per day

Considering the small economic output of Russia, this does seem damn wasteful. Large potential for conservation. Is gasoline subsidized in Russia?

By the way, maybe consumption is pushed upwards due to a large refinery sector which while consuming lots of crude also exports lots of diesel and gasoline?

#7   Canada 2,193,000 barrels per day    

Damn wasteful too, compared to France which is twice the population at the same GDP.

#10   France 2,060,000 barrels per day    



Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Fri Jul 28th, 2006 at 07:14:00 AM EST
Check out Primary energy consumption (per capita and per $GDP).

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 28th, 2006 at 07:49:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
what about such important factors as country's territory and climate?

If you take for every country  its oil consumption per capita, per GDP, per area (say, in square metres) and add some coefficient connected with climatic zone (say a 10.0 for the countries with the most favourable weather which will include the bulk of Central/Western Europe and put a 1.0 for the country with the worst climate - Russia and put the rest of world in between)
...er... and why do i want to multiply all this, not that i know anything about non-linear stuff... ah well, then you will get figures which may show another picture (very simplistic but anyway) of the worst natural resource wasters in the world

I am even not sure that the US will be the number one offenders

by lana on Fri Jul 28th, 2006 at 08:39:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, if you pick your weightings like that ... and why pick area as a factor? Consumption per capita's (and maybe per capita gdp) more interesting than total consumption, but the rest tends to hide complicated factors.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 28th, 2006 at 08:48:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You could use area per capita as an indication of wastefulness.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 28th, 2006 at 08:55:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Total consumption makes a lot of sense to evaluate the global impact of an individual government's policy. For instace, a 10% change in US consumption is more than enough to provide all of Italy's oil. If you look at oil consumption per capita, you'll find the Virgin Islands, Gibraltar and Singapore are the worst offenders. That tells you keeping a microstate going is expensive, but eliminating them would not solve any of the world's global energy problems.

So, first use the aggregate figures to find which political agents are associated with the biggest impacts, and then use the normalised figures to see which of those are inefficient.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 28th, 2006 at 09:15:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore are pretty wasteful compared to their size. The Netherlands consumes more than Australia as well...
by das monde on Sun Jul 30th, 2006 at 10:45:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series