Display:
Housing "crashes" are rarely much more than 10-20% in the frothy California/New York type markets.
I had the personal experience of buying a somewhat upscale condo in southern California in 1990, when the housing slump was already 1 1/2 years along,,,,,and finding when I wanted to sell in '93 that prices were down an additional 30%.  And I've been in California now for 17 years,,,,and the market seems to me to be very volatile, both up and down.  So I guess my personal experience has been different than yours--I don't have any published statistics on California to support either of us.
by wchurchill on Sun Jul 9th, 2006 at 03:06:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I had one in Norcal the same time.  

Bought in 87 for $290K, identical sold for $415 in 89,
By 95 prob back to $320ish.  Luckily we didn't need to sell until 99 for roughly $490K.  Sold again last year for mid $900s.

Yes CA is ugly volatile, but mostly to the upside.  That 90-93 puke out was the worst I've ever seen in this country.  UK in early 90's (London area) was equally ugly if not worse.  It's just pretty unusual for the haircut to be more than 20% in my experience.  

Condos are worse than single family houses to the downside as you are now well aware.  

by HiD on Sun Jul 9th, 2006 at 06:56:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Watching HGTV makes me wonder if any condo exists in SoCal that is not upscale, at least in price.  You can't buy a closet in LA for less than half a million these days.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Sun Jul 9th, 2006 at 08:25:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series