Display:
I have been thinking an active tax policy should be used to discourage any increase in fossil fuel consumption. Say, if the EU imports 3% more fossil fuels one year than the next, slap on a 3% increse in tax. This could be done on a fuel-by-fuel basis. So, if aviation fuel is the fastest growing fuel (just for the sake of argument) it would see the largest tax increase year-on-year. This tax should go to the EU directly, not the member states, and be earmarked for non-fossil-fuel transportation R+D and infrastructure.

But this is part of a broader transportation energy policy and beyond the scope of this consultation.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Jul 10th, 2006 at 05:41:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
They do consider taxation (or relief) as part of an active policy. There's no reason not to say that fossil fuels should be taxed.

Starting with aircraft fuel, and agricultural (with incentives to switch to home-grown biodiesel, no tax on that).

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Jul 10th, 2006 at 05:52:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series