Display:
As Migeru points out, the French right has constantly referred back to De Gaulle, practically ad nauseam. Chirac is the supposed "heir" to the line, and his party, (was the RPR, is now the UMP), is known as the Gaullist party. Not long ago Chirac said he was Gaullist.

There are two other main tendencies on the right: the Le Pen, Vichy extreme-right, haters of De Gaulle since WW2; and the centrists, once led by former president Giscard d'Estaing. This group (the party is called the UDF) is not as influential as it was in Giscard's time, the '70s. It's now led by François Bayrou who is trying to make room for himself (for the presidential) by distancing himself from the "Gaullists", who are in government.

The two great individual figures of the post-WW2 French political scene are undoubtedly De Gaulle and Mitterand. By openly affiliating herself to Mitterand, Royal is making a bold declaration of what she claims is her capacity and stature. Mitterand was neither an ideology nor a policy buff, so it doesn't count on Royal's part as a declaration of intent in either of those fields.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Aug 21st, 2006 at 03:06:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That's sorta what I had figured out about French political mythology. Your summary is concise and helpful.

Now if they can just work Clovis and the dove in there somewhere, everybody can go to lunch.

by Richard Lyon (rllyon@gmail.com) on Mon Aug 21st, 2006 at 03:19:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Everybody will go to lunch anyway.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Aug 21st, 2006 at 03:39:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series