Display:
Although the Commission has the right to take any initiative it considers appropriate to attain the objectives of the Treaties, most proposals are a response to legal obligations, technical requirements or to a specific request for action from another institution, a Member State or from the interested parties.
(EU commission "basic facts")

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Aug 24th, 2006 at 07:37:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Are you saying "specific request for action" = "consultation participation"?
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Aug 24th, 2006 at 07:49:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, but I'm saying that if the Member States are expected to submit suggestions to the Commission on their own initiative, they have all the more reason to be expected to submit input into  a public consultation, especially as the discussion includes imposing quotas to the member states.

After the commission produces its proposal for an updated regime under the 2003 directove, or even a new directive, the Member States will be less able to steer the proccess. The earlier you put your input in, the bigger the final effect of your input.

I don't see anything wrong, it's all in the public eye. For instance, now we have a position by the UK government and in the future they could be challenged if they contradict themselves.

If you want to conclude that the EU is indeed run by bureaucrats, I won't stand in your way.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Aug 24th, 2006 at 07:54:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't want to conclude anything, but I think you know that ;)

OK, so let MSs contribute input to public consultations. It's still very far from the only influence they have. Take the "online poll" for the Energy Green paper, for example. If the only way Member States can have their say about an essential aspect of policy like energy is to go through that manipulative process, then...

No, don't let me reach a conclusion...

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Aug 24th, 2006 at 08:07:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's the only way we can see. We can safely assume there are personal, political, institutional contacts that we can't see, more informal than formal. Formally, the mmeber states get involved in "codecision" with the EP after the Commission is done with it. But there's more than what's formally codified. We might even be able to get somewhere as citizens by writing directly to the commissioners, we just don't know that. If a commissioner were or had been your elected representative back at home at some point you might have a better shot than others.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Aug 24th, 2006 at 08:11:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series