Display:
Here are some energy conversion efficiency estimates.

  • The efficiency of turning electricity into heat is 100%. Any inefficiency in the process shows up as heat, which is what you're trying to get in the first place.
  • The efficiency of turning heat into electricity is much worse, around 30% or so depending on exactly how you do it.
  • Turning fuel into heat is also pretty efficient because again, any "waste" energy is given off as heat.
  • Turning electricity into motion is pretty efficient (ignoring storage and electricity transmission factors), with good electric motors in the >90% range.
  • Turning fuel into motion depends again on the system, but a diesel engine in a truck is around 40%.

In fact, this list shows the basic two problems:
1.) Burning stuff to make electricity is not very efficient.
2.) Burning stuff to get motion is also not very efficient.
Unfortunately, those are the two things you most want to do.
by asdf on Thu Aug 24th, 2006 at 11:23:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually with a high-temperature heat source (>800°C) the efficiency of electricity generation can be >50% (this is the case with state-of-the-art coal/gas fired power plants, but it is impossible to reach with current technology nuclear plants).

Note also that turning fuel into heat may be only 60% efficient with older burners that let a good portion of the heat go away with the CO2 through the exhaust pipe, instead of into the heat transfer fluid (the water for the radiators in a house). You need recent "recondensing" boilers to reach >90% efficiency (they cool the exhaust so much that steam condenses and must be drained: if the boiler has a tiny pipe to the sewer, it is one of those). Also, tap-water boilers with a permanent candle were using ~50% of the gas just to stay online...

Pierre

by Pierre on Fri Aug 25th, 2006 at 05:08:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series