Neo-con alert BBC "Hard Talk": Jose Maria Aznar (24 July 2006)Stephen Sackur talks to Spain's former Prime Minister about the global war on terror and about why he feels his party lost the last election in Spain following the Madrid train bombs. THIS INTERVIEW WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING SHORTLY. Iraq, Afghanistan and now Lebanon. All of them are on the frontlines in the global war on terror according to the Bush administration. This view causes unease in some parts of Europe but not for former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar. He is still a close ally of George W Bush. Is he out of step with his own continent?I was alerted to this by La Vanguardia, which claims that Aznar would admit NATO bommbings of Lebanon if Israel was a member of NATO. Which I suppose sheds some light on our recent discussions of Israel in NATO and NATO in Lebanon. This just confirms that the answer should be 'no' to both questions.
BBC "Hard Talk": Jose Maria Aznar (24 July 2006)
Stephen Sackur talks to Spain's former Prime Minister about the global war on terror and about why he feels his party lost the last election in Spain following the Madrid train bombs. THIS INTERVIEW WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING SHORTLY. Iraq, Afghanistan and now Lebanon. All of them are on the frontlines in the global war on terror according to the Bush administration. This view causes unease in some parts of Europe but not for former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar. He is still a close ally of George W Bush. Is he out of step with his own continent?
THIS INTERVIEW WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING SHORTLY.
Iraq, Afghanistan and now Lebanon. All of them are on the frontlines in the global war on terror according to the Bush administration.
This view causes unease in some parts of Europe but not for former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar. He is still a close ally of George W Bush.
Is he out of step with his own continent?
How did Spain tolerate him for eight years?!
I provided a link to the English transcript, complete with the grammatical mistakes (like no -ed or -s at the end of verbs). The guys who translated and subtitled the video did Aznar a favour and translated what he meant, not what he said. But the actual text would have been too unbelievable.
Of course he belongs in a DC thonk tink, he taught International Relations at Georgetown [in English!!] for an academic year after he left power [his lectures about Spanish history and the war on civilization are legendary], and he's been appointed to Murdoch's board of directors (just like Blair will).
Oh, BTW, how does the US tolerate Bush? His English is not much better. Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
hehe, I meant "The War of Civilizations", but the truth came out. Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
(I know Spanish people are probably sick of Manuel. I'm Swedish, please feel free to bring up the Chef. Bork, bork.)
But seriously, is the answer going to be "The Economy"? -----sapere aude
Picard: "They are the Borg" Sloane: "Borg? that sounds Swedish"
And later, after meeting Borg drones:
Sloane: "Definitely not Swedish".
Asnar I fight terrorism. I fight ETA in Spain. E. T. R was ... Journalist Windows Spell Check: You mean E. T. A. Asnar: Whatever
A pleasure I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude
In any case, I was so puzzled when he says itiaahhhrg...that I have to love the journalist...Priceless.
have a try..it has been front paged for you
Para los de escolar or
Practicando español
