Display:
If pressed, what I personally would probably advocate is an independent foreign policy for Europe, and I see Atlanticism [embdied in NATO] as submitting European policy to US diktat. Sure, with Bush in the White House "containment" seems like a fair description of what Europe should be (or maybe is increasingly) doing. With a more civilised administration that is actually interested in working within the international system, Europe would likely act as an ally of the US.

Less NATO, more UN, a multipolar world. Feel free to make a realpolitik argument for why it can't work.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. — Euripides

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Sep 14th, 2006 at 04:19:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But the commenters here are not talking about a short term tactical shift in European foreign that will then revert back to Atlanticism when US policy goes back to a sanity, but rather a long term strategic reorientation.

I mean, before Europe has the leeway to tactically shift its position with respect to the US, a strategic reorientation needs to take place. Right now, US strategy seems to define the boundaries of Europe's tactics.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. — Euripides

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Sep 14th, 2006 at 04:22:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series