manon: I just watched "Loose Change" Fran: The conspiracy thing just doesn't seem to go away manon: What convinced me was the pentagon crash Jerome: I don't intend to ban anyone on this like on dKos, but I find the topic tasteless, pointless and mindless. manon: so I guess this isn't really an open thread, is it? Jerome: Oh it's open. Which also includes the right to say that what you write is silly and worse. manon: Really? any reason for saying that or just a prejudice? Jerome: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And sprinkling the thread with "1" and "2" ratings and using a righteous, insulted tone does little for your credibility. Migeru: The thread might have turned out differently if you had said "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" initially, instead of bringing up Kos' banning policy. Jerome: You honestly think so?
You may note also that, apart form my initial comment, I dropped in at comment 80 or 90. Obviously I was not successful at stopping this silliness. Maybe I should have censored things, since I'm accused of it anyway. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
I am not going to put anything "somewhere in the wiki" about your policy on anything. There are places for admins to put those kinds of things. Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. — Euripides
I guess this isn't really an open thread..?
and
Oh it's open. Which also includes the right...
1 hr and 10 mins of invective.
Your "montage" isn't of any help because it doesn't reflect the real flow of the thread.
But you make a good point. Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. — Euripides
No one is saying 9-11 did not happen.
Some people are just questioning how it happened.
Remember the magic bullet in the JFK assassination?
Questioning established facts is not a bad thing, IMHO.
You guys see wreckage, and I see a few items. You guys see proof from the burn marks on the building, I don't see anything of the sort.
Why is that a bad thing?
