I think that the level of conspiracy-writing or, the other way around, debunking of conspiracy, that we here at ET can come up with, is based on data that is completely external to us and frankly not very accessible to us either. If we accept the external proof that there was no Pentagon crash, or its contrary, that there was a Pentagon crash, we are only taking chances in both cases.
Basing any theory, conspiracy or its contrary, on pictures, can't really get us very far. Pictures or their settings, can be doctored (no conspiracy), and can be interpreted (conspiracy).
And people who have investigated more than a few crash scenes, are the best people, IMO, to interpret the evidence.
Now, If someone could help me locate that picture of Ms. Royal that appeared here several weeks ago, I will go away and write a diary. "When the abyss stares at me, it wets its pants." Brian Hopkins
But maybe it's not her, just someone looking like her. Who knows? In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
I already had this one.
TeHeHe.
But your picture is much bigger, DL.
Thanks. "When the abyss stares at me, it wets its pants." Brian Hopkins
