I see a whole in a building, soot marks on the grass and some on the Pentagon, and broken windows
I don't see any plane wreckage
engine:
hole cut by the right-side engine next to the smashed generator:
wreckage of seats behind the Honeywell GTCP331-200 APU:
*Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
I could fit it in one large suitcase
the point of the makers of the film was that that was ALL the wreckage that existed. now compare that to another airplane wreckage and you'll find that there isn't a lot here
where's the rest of the seats, engines, fuselage, luggage, etc? I don't even see little bits of them on the ground
and look at the cable spools - they look intact
physicist: none =0.000000
engineer: 0 ± 1 or 2
by none, I meant not a lot. You don't even have enough parts to build 1/10 of an engine there. there are 2 engines. about 150 seats and at least 100 people with their baggage. (other engineers would understand that, by the way.)
And sprinkling the thread with "1" and "2" ratings and using a righteous, insulted tone does little for your credibility. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
manon: I just watched "Loose Change" Fran: The conspiracy thing just doesn't seem to go away manon: What convinced me was the pentagon crash Jerome: I don't intend to ban anyone on this like on dKos, but I find the topic tasteless, pointless and mindless. manon: so I guess this isn't really an open thread, is it? Jerome: Oh it's open. Which also includes the right to say that what you write is silly and worse. manon: Really? any reason for saying that or just a prejudice? Jerome: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And sprinkling the thread with "1" and "2" ratings and using a righteous, insulted tone does little for your credibility. Migeru: The thread might have turned out differently if you had said "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" initially, instead of bringing up Kos' banning policy. Jerome: You honestly think so?
You may note also that, apart form my initial comment, I dropped in at comment 80 or 90. Obviously I was not successful at stopping this silliness. Maybe I should have censored things, since I'm accused of it anyway. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
I am not going to put anything "somewhere in the wiki" about your policy on anything. There are places for admins to put those kinds of things. Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. — Euripides
I guess this isn't really an open thread..?
and
Oh it's open. Which also includes the right...
1 hr and 10 mins of invective.
Your "montage" isn't of any help because it doesn't reflect the real flow of the thread.
But you make a good point. Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. — Euripides
No one is saying 9-11 did not happen.
Some people are just questioning how it happened.
Remember the magic bullet in the JFK assassination?
Questioning established facts is not a bad thing, IMHO.
You guys see wreckage, and I see a few items. You guys see proof from the burn marks on the building, I don't see anything of the sort.
Why is that a bad thing?
So someone's brain was open for business? Really?
that way, I can get a Spanish translation as well
Look, let's be kind and say you must have been very confused. And didn't mean to make unfortunate insinuations about this site and the way it's run, or the people, Jerome first, who put in a huge amount of their time here for 0 kopeks.
