Display:
...comprehensive heat insulation is in fact crucial to all steam locomotives and was neglected in the past until Porta came along.

I am shocked, but I do recall images of steam engines with lots of uninsulated pipe. If these were hot pipes, or if boilers and the like were uninsulated, then it would seem that locomotive engineers were quite mad. Massive heat leaks don't do much for efficiency.

Can you say more about this?

Words and ideas I offer here may be used freely and without attribution.

by technopolitical on Sun Sep 3rd, 2006 at 07:22:37 PM EST
Couldn't agree more. Although it depends on what pipes you are talking about e.g. injectors need to be kept cool otherwise they don't work. But I have seen whole unlagged areas of firebox on some photos of American locomotives, which seems to me a criminal waste of heat. Porta stressed the amount of heat loss that occurred at the cylinder ends that were often inadequately heat-insulated or not at all and encouraged condensation and loss of cylinder efficiency.

What is often considered one of Stephensonian steam's greatest assets is the fact that it will keep on working (after a fashion) in the most unfavourable circumstances - that's also been its Achilles heel because it has encouraged sloppy practice. Of course it does not invalidate the technology per se and such a criticism could never be levelled at the modern steam engineers I have cited - and they get results. Moreover you cannot get away with it when high-tech water-tube boilers are involved (They don't like you calling them "boilers", you're supposed to say "steam generator" - well, a rose by any other name...)

John of Paris

by JohnofParis (wrightdotperrierarrobasfreedotfr) on Sun Sep 3rd, 2006 at 11:00:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series