Display:
We need just one bit of input to finish off the first section of the current draft (over at writeboard)
we are told:
Europe has not yet developed fully competitive internal energy markets. Only when such markets exist will EU citizens and businesses enjoy all the benefits of security of supply and lower prices. (...) Furthermore, the consolidation of the energy sector should be market driven...
This is presented as a declaration of fact, when it is a debatable, and far from generally accepted, proposition. [Some references would be useful here. Do any of the FT's more sensible columnists have something that could be quoted?]


Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. — Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Sep 24th, 2006 at 09:06:46 AM EST
Look here for engineer's view, which probably could be cited at this point.
Deregulation of the electric power industry was a bad idea. It resulted in a complete industry restructuring, an increase in costs, and a decline in reliability. While the prior procedures had problems, mostly caused by poor regulatory procedures, doing away with regulation was not the answer, improved regulation was. If a car has a transmission problem, you don't solve the problem by replacing the engine.
Academic economists are mostly pro-deregulation, but claim that it was never done properly, at least in the USA, see arguments by a notable proponent Lynne Kiesling from NorthWestern U.
by Sargon on Sun Sep 24th, 2006 at 10:54:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series