He said we should send the latest version anyway. We can always claim we sent an old draft by mistake as opposed to calling it "errata".
We can always send version 13 which is exactly as our prevvious submission plus the new paragraph.
Version 14 and later already contain more and more substantial rewordings of other things.
Options:
I frankly don't believe it matters a whole lot with DG-TREN. Since the only consultation was IPM, they don't put up (unless I'm mistaken) a page with contributions as with the Biofuels Consultation. They may acknowledge receipt. I sent the e-mails return receipt, but that should go to etg@eurotrib.com, which only Jérôme has access to. So should any response they make.
They're not going to take any notice of what we say anyway, we know that ;)
Presentation of the WP, December 2006.
