Display:
Jérôme, if the two paragraphs you mean are "Public leadership..." and the following paragraph in bold ending "...core topics of the debate", they were before the "financial costs" insertion in version 5 yesterday.

They seem better at the end of Section Two, leading on to the missing questions in the GP.

Should they be moved down there? (i.e. at the end, not the beginning, of the insertion?)

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Sep 25th, 2006 at 08:29:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The text is now as Jerome left it.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Sep 25th, 2006 at 08:35:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In fact it hasn't changed, I don't know what he means about moving down and back up.

However, don't those two paragraphs make more sense at the end of the insertion rather than the beginning? Meaning, as a lead on to Section Three, the missing questions?

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Sep 25th, 2006 at 08:40:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I saw a version (Migeru's) where they were brought down, which did make sense. I was simply suggesting to slightly update their wording to make them fit with the following sentences a bit better.

Do as you care to.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Sep 25th, 2006 at 09:29:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I made an edit and left a comment.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Sep 25th, 2006 at 09:36:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Me too, practically on top of yours. I left a comment.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Sep 25th, 2006 at 09:49:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series