I'm beginning to wonder how we see what it is we see and then we don't...
I'm wondering whether people tick the "minor edit" box when they shouldn't, or what a genuine edit conflict looks like. Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
The question is, is it right to move them down?
But I am beginning to wonder about conflicts, since we have had several that are really inexplicable.
I certainly didn't delete this financial costs piece by Jérôme, for example. I would not delete a piece as substantial without referring to the author. And when you pointed out that it was missing, I would have remembered and said I took it out for one reason or another. I wonder if he and I were editing close in time to one another and one version scrambled the other.
And Jérôme didn't see the version that resulted from your copy-editing, then mine...