As an experiment, I've set up the following writeboard, which is a simple on-line collaborative editor, it's got a current version of the letter.

  DG-TREN Letter
  http://123.writeboard.com/52ba421d56bc6d403/login
  Password: wiffle

No. Because, though there are points here and there (like the last paragraph) that could be redrafted now, there have been more substantial suggestions -- such as going through more questions and pointing out how manipulative they are, how they exclude options other than the Commission's, etc. Plus also a fuller development suggested on languages, by pointing out that the questionnaire is shoddily translated into other languages than English. This I need some more confirmation on from other-language speakers.

Since the resulting redraft is likely to be considerably longer than Draft One, I'm waiting to see clear on these points.

Take it I'll change "your Commission" in line 1 (as nanne suggests), and will use various redrafts proposed here to rewrite the final paragraph.

What do you think? Would you systematically pull apart  the entire questionnaire, question by question?

How would you handle the language question?