* whether to do (appended or not) a full take-down of the questionnaire;
whether to add a paragraph pointing out that alternative policy options are largely excluded from the questionnaire;
pointing out that translation work on the questionnaire seems poor (with possibly appended examples);
what to think of "minimum standards" on what kind of org can participate as an org in consultations.
If we send multiple copies as individuals, that's different.
The European Tribune is an online forum for civic debate, with a strong focus on European issues.
That's one possibility (we may need one of those anyway), but probably the best thing here is multiple copies or, better, multiple signing by individuals from as many countries as possible. With reference to European Tribune, certainly. (Contributor, contributing editor, etc).
May need to list both nationality and residence. Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
"Wish" to be included as an org? We ask to be considered as an org?
I wouldn't like to get a response from Piebalg's office saying "Nice try, but we don't have to listen to you."
Multiple signatures is probably the way to go, referencing ET all the same, of course.
