Display:
In fact, the use of an image isn't necessary in this letter, and if my reading of the option is mistaken, we can pull that.

"Wish" to be included as an org? We ask to be considered as an org?

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Sep 7th, 2006 at 12:55:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
We just assume we will be considered as an organisation?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Thu Sep 7th, 2006 at 12:57:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
We were considered as an organisation by the DG Transport, so we have a precedent that not worrying about it is the right thing to do...

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Sep 7th, 2006 at 12:58:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This is a substantial complaint we're making (unlike Biofuels) and we're sending it to the top.

I wouldn't like to get a response from Piebalg's office saying "Nice try, but we don't have to listen to you."

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Sep 7th, 2006 at 01:01:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Then sign it with multiple names on behalf of European Tribune. It's not a response to a consultation in any case, it's a response to how the consultation is being run. If you raise the issue directly you run a high risk that we will not be considered an organisation.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Thu Sep 7th, 2006 at 01:04:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My intention was to raise the issue here, not in the letter.

Multiple signatures is probably the way to go, referencing ET all the same, of course.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Sep 7th, 2006 at 01:17:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series