Display:
I usually try to tie everything back to economics, so many religious wars I think could be shown to be based upon the desire to acquire land or riches, while the religious part was the window dressing of the day. But I really can't believe that the Franco-Prussian war, or WWI and WWII were about France or Germany trying to gain lasting economic advantage over the other. That's why I said they were about "nothing". You are free to call this "power and prestige" if you like.

I've never been a big fan of economic determinism. I don't see why we should privilege the desire for wealth as somehow more real, more fundamental, than other motivations. It's a legacy of Marx, I guess, to think of non-economic factors as a superstructure, as something that in the end is only an outgrowth or mask for materialist factors. I don't see it. Religion, nationalism, power - personal or collective - all seem to me to be quite powerful forces. When it comes to understanding behaviour, real is whatever people believe to be so. Then again all such motivations overlap with one another.

by MarekNYC on Mon Jan 29th, 2007 at 05:10:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's a legacy of Marx.  Ummm ...  I'm afraid we (regular capitalist) economists deserve more of the blame than Marx since our classical theory rests largely on the assumption that firms will act so as to maximize profits.

"Beware of the man who does not talk, and the dog that does not bark." Cheyenne
by maracatu on Mon Jan 29th, 2007 at 05:35:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series