Display:
Some numbers on this, first thing I found off Google.

A 22-year study by Cornell that points to various benefits to organic cultivation of corn over the long term, and demonstrates equivalent yields in normal years and superior yields in drought years.

As far as the intensive/extensive farming debate goes, I think the example of Japan is interesting, as it has rather impressive yields despite what would be considered a very inefficient organization of agriculture -- lots of little farms, with lots of people working at them.

There are some interesting numbers on this point at the World Resources Institute on yields per hectare and whatnot.  Comparing the US, home of industrial mega-farming, and Japan, where I look out the window and see 90 year old grandmothers tilling the ground by hand, you can get some sense of the efficiencies possible with small-scale agriculture.

Japan, cereals    Average crop yield (kg per ha) 6147
US, cereals       Average crop yield (kg per ha) 5824

Japan, Ag. Workers as Percent of Pop, %7.3
US, Ag. Workers as Percent of Pop, %2.9

Now, these are average numbers, and I am sure there are more efficient farms elsewhere that balance out the little plots farmed by 90-year old grandmothers where I live.

Admittedly, Japan has a far higher per-hectare fertilizer usage rate.  The stats on this page are all fertilizer types combined.

Japan, fertilizer per hectare    295
US, fertilizer per hectare       111

But when I was studying Japanese history, I read that in the pre-industrial Edo period fish-meal fertilizers were a huge business, and used by most every farmer who had the means to do so.  So, I started to wonder what proportion of Japan's fertilizers were of the traditional type, but can't find data on that.

This data is sorta tangential to the discussion

by Zwackus on Wed Jan 3rd, 2007 at 09:18:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for bringing in the Japanese angle, Zwackus. I don't know the answer re fertilisers myself, and it's interesting, since American farming methods don't generally stint the fertiliser.

It may be that Japanese soil husbandry over centuries has delivered a more fertile soil today. Which would fit the Cornell study's showing that soil fertility increases over years of organic farming.

This article suggests that Japanese farming today uses chemical fertilisers causing environmental damage, which recourse to traditional fish-meal use may help to limit.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Jan 4th, 2007 at 03:00:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Also, intensive irrigation helps.  Somewhere around %50 percent of Japanese agriculture is irrigated, mostly rice fields I would suspect.

I have to admit, I was surprised at the distinctly greater fertilizer usage by the Japanese, as I'd always thought Americans were the worst.  But I suppose if you're out there, looking at every crop and spraying by hand, then maybe you'd end up using more than one would with an even spraying via plane.

by Zwackus on Thu Jan 4th, 2007 at 03:26:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Fertiliser use in modern agriculture is all about cost optimisation and about maximising profit. i.e. sales against cost of labour, land and fertilisers.

With land and labour scarcer and more expensive, and more intensely subsidised food prices in Japan, fertiliser use is more profitable - thus Japanese farmers get their optimal return with a higher amount of fertiliser. It's also a product of much more intensive agriculture, too.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Thu Jan 4th, 2007 at 07:46:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series