Display:
Chaotic dynamics does not imply unlimited amplitude of dynamical change. In some instances, I'd answer, "Yes, of course, and with certainty (for some systems!), provided that the prediction specifies bounds to change, rather than detailed dynamics". In the present instance, I'd say, "Yes, and with considerable confidence, if the bounds are wide enough."

Words and ideas I offer here may be used freely and without attribution.
by technopolitical on Tue Jan 9th, 2007 at 12:24:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sorry to be brief in my reply but I just got in from work and my brain is fried.

To be useful the prediction has to be able to guide action otherwise it's pointless.  If your control variable(s) become state variable(s), for example, you may be within model parameters, as far as variable value assignment, but the modeled has escape the model.  And that is IF the differential equations are solvable; a big IF as the majority of 'em ain't.

No amplitude is unlimited, of course, as the dynamic system will self-destruct under continuous positive feedback, when one hooks the emitter to the base of a transistor, or becomes non-dynamic under continuous negative feedback.    

by ATinNM on Tue Jan 9th, 2007 at 11:24:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series