The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
On the left wing, we have - if we stretch the definition of 'left wing' a bit - three parties: The Socialists. The Popular Socialists and the Social Democrats. For various domestic reasons, the Socialists do not currently seem like a viable party at the moment, which leaves us with the Popular Socialists and the Social Democrats.
Then we have the right-wing bloc composed of - from left to right - the Liberals, the Conservatives and New Alliance (essentially a bought-and-paid-for attempt by rich biznizmen to inject Reagan-style voodoo economics into Danish politics, from which they have been thankfully absent for the last decade or so).
Lastly there are two parties, the Danish Popular Party and the Social Liberals who are aligned with the right-wing and left-wing blocs, respectively, but cannot really be counted as belonging there in any meaningful sense - the fact that they are aligned in that way is more of a historical artifact.
So, if you're a leftist, you basically have the choice between the Popular Socialists and the Social Democrats. That means that you can impose one (1) absolute constraint on your choice of party. That constraint is not going to be EU policy.
If you're in the rightist bloc, you've got a bit more choice - at least if you consider the Conservatives a long-term viable party, something I'm not entirely sure I do. But the fundamental picture is the same - Union policy has to be either second or third (after fiscal and taxation policy, of course) on your list of priority policy areas to even be in the running when it comes to selecting party.
And I usually think that we have a rather diverse political spectrum...
If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
I suppose if I were in Denmark I'd lean towards the Social Liberals of Radikale Venstre.
Only until you saw their taxation policy. Oh, and I'm not very happy about their view of schools either. But that's for another time.
OTOH, I'd say that imploding is a bit harsh. It'd be more accurate to say that they're splitting clear down the middle.
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 10 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by gmoke - May 17
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by Migeru - May 7 8 comments
by gmoke - May 17
by ARGeezer - May 1610 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments
by In Wales - Apr 2136 comments