Display:
The future?
Nah, this is the past, present, and future!
We do not need better information/facts/data or dissemination thereof. We need better propaganda.
by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Mon Oct 15th, 2007 at 09:52:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The 'future' in the sense that numeracy will become increasingly important as access to information increases.

Furthermore, I am not as pessimistic as some here with respect to the possibility of enhancing numeracy. Consider how monumental a task it is to ensure basic literacy. Yet that is possible. We do not today make an effort towards ensuring that the broad population possesses basic numeracy that is a fraction of the effort we make towards ensuring that the same people possess basic literacy.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Oct 15th, 2007 at 10:07:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think we might be at about equal levels for basic numeracy and literacy. People might be able 'to read', but they are not able to read critically, even when the sources do not contain numbers. Just as they are able to compare and manipulate simple numbers, but not be able to think critically about what these numbers say.
by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Mon Oct 15th, 2007 at 10:12:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd have to politely differ here. It's pretty clear that when presented with a report, people split clear into two groups - those that read the numbers (because it's faster and usually gives a fairly complete picture even without the text) and those who read the text because the text is all they can read; the numbers is so much word salad to them (if you'll excuse the expression).

Furthermore, if somebody said 'Bill Gates is very rich - therefore all Americans are rich,' which is the rough plain-text equivalent of what these bozos in Svenskt Näringsliv did with their numbers, I am fairly confident that not only most newsies, but the majority of the general population would notice. And yes, their treatment is actually that bad.

Perhaps it is because there is less of a soft middle road with numbers - to some extend, you either get it or you don't. With text, OTOH, there's the middle road, where you know what it says but not what it means.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Oct 15th, 2007 at 03:36:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series