Display:
I'd have some trouble fitting a downwards curve to that data ....

Not if you were with the American Enterprise Institute :-P

Day by day data might draw an interesting curve.

Nah, random scatter would obscure any trend if you go to that resoluation.

I tried running two- and three-month running averages, but that doesn't make things a lot prettier, so I decided to just go ahead an post the raw data. This leads me to believe that a resolution of about one month (maybe you could push it down to two weeks, or even one week, but I don't think you could go much further) is about optimal as far as grouping goes.

Of course, one could use running averages (i.e. have a data point for each day that represents the average deaths pr. day for the 30-day period leading up to the point). But I'm not convinced that there is sufficient additional information to be obtained by doing so to justify the bother.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Oct 19th, 2007 at 10:47:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Not saying it's meaningful though ;-)

the subtle mathematical technique used is called drawing a random line that shows the message you intend  and bluffing competence.  I think it's the same technique used in the original graph in the story.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Fri Oct 19th, 2007 at 10:59:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series