Display:
The problem is the difference between the aims - what the legislatin is meant to achieve - and its actual effect, which is decided by the courts. The summary would be meaningless and, even worse, would be called dishonest by the anti-crowd where it disagrees with their interpretation of the language in the real stuff.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Oct 19th, 2007 at 12:41:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It is possible for the courts to interpret legislation with the purpose of the legislation and what it is meant to achieve in mind. I know all sorts of things get overturned from one case to another though. I'm not ignorant of the complexities or totally removed from the pragmatics but I suppose I am idealistic about what I'd really like to see.

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Fri Oct 19th, 2007 at 05:54:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series