Display:
Death, destruction, peak oil.

Steep decline in oil production brings risk of war and unrest, says new study

· Output peaked in 2006 and will fall 7% a year
· Decline in gas, coal and uranium also predicted

World oil production has already peaked and will fall by half as soon as 2030, according to a report which also warns that extreme shortages of fossil fuels will lead to wars and social breakdown.

The German-based Energy Watch Group will release its study in London today saying that global oil production peaked in 2006 - much earlier than most experts had expected. The report, which predicts that production will now fall by 7% a year, comes after oil prices set new records almost every day last week, on Friday hitting more than $90 (£44) a barrel.

"The world soon will not be able to produce all the oil it needs as demand is rising while supply is falling. This is a huge problem for the world economy," said Hans-Josef Fell, EWG's founder and the German MP behind the country's successful support system for renewable energy.



And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Sun Oct 21st, 2007 at 08:57:46 PM EST
Output peaked in 2006 and will fall 7% a year...

World oil production has already peaked and will fall by half as soon as 2030

well if it falls by 7% a year, then it hits 50% in about 9 years not 23

for it to halve by 2030, then it would fall by about 3% per year.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Sun Oct 21st, 2007 at 09:22:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
2.9687% -- to be exact

(Didn't see your comment before I started mine.)

by ATinNM on Sun Oct 21st, 2007 at 09:36:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
and we don't all have fancy financial calculators ;-)

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Sun Oct 21st, 2007 at 10:31:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In the pretty pictures I have seen on peak oil it would appear to follow some form of bell curve. Not sure of the foundations that model rests on, but I would guess that they would be using something like that.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
by A swedish kind of death on Sun Oct 21st, 2007 at 10:53:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
well in the pretty pictures here

then you're looking at the oil supply halving by 2040, which still isn't good.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Mon Oct 22nd, 2007 at 04:43:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
To a first approximation, it follows a logistic equation. It is "a" bell curve, but not "the" bell curve.

We have met the enemy, and it is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Oct 29th, 2007 at 05:24:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Maybe a 3% decline is 7% less than the current IEA forecast, or something?

We have met the enemy, and it is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Oct 29th, 2007 at 05:23:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Breaking-out my trusty HP 12-C financial calculator ... and let's see ...  

Negative 7% is a decline to 48.3982% of current production at the end of 10 years?

Jeebus criminey, that is Not Good.

How reliable is the Energy Watch Group?

by ATinNM on Sun Oct 21st, 2007 at 09:31:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well looking at their website they appear to be linked to the German Greens, and a pile of alternative enrgy companies. If they have a bias, then you'd expect them to be exxagerating the problems with oil.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Sun Oct 21st, 2007 at 10:30:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
could be that existing production declines by 7%, but total production (i.e. including new fields put on stream) declines less quickly.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Oct 22nd, 2007 at 01:33:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The EWG makes rather detailed research papers, so I don't believe they made such a gross error. This could be a journalist quoting out of context. I go look at what it said in the original.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Oct 22nd, 2007 at 08:01:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
On page 67 of the now posted report (pdf, 101 pages!):

According to the scenario calculations, oil production will decline by about 50% until 2030. This is equivalent to an average annual decline rate of 3%, well in line with the US experience where oil production from the lower 48 states declined by 2-3% per year.

However, it must be noted that this is a moderate assumption as today a large fraction of the oil is produced offshore. Offshore fields are produced by very aggressive modern extraction methods, e.g. injection of water, gas, heat and surfactants - in order to increase the pressure and decrease the viscosity - and horizontal drilling - in order to extract the oil faster. These methods allow the faster extraction of the oil for a limited time. The horizontal wells allow to extract more oil per time, but as soon as the water level reaches the horizontal well, oil production switches to water production almost within several months. These production methods lead to decline rates after peak of 10% per year or even more (e.g. 14% per year in Cantarell (Mexico), 8-10% in Alaska, UK and Norway, more than 10% in Oman and possibly 10% or more in Ghawar, the world's largest oil field in Saudi Arabia).



*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Oct 22nd, 2007 at 08:09:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Now I have went through the actual report, the executive summary, and the press report -- I nowhere find 7% therein, only 3%. Methinks the Guardian made some big error...

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Oct 22nd, 2007 at 08:23:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The journo probably misread "several" for "seven", in the Executive Summary (pdf!):

Conclusion

The major result from this analysis is that world oil production has peaked in 2006. Production will start to decline at a rate of several percent per year. By 2020, and even more by 2030, global oil supply will be dramatically lower. This will create a supply gap which can hardly be closed by growing contributions from other fossil, nuclear or alternative energy sources in this time frame.



*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Oct 22nd, 2007 at 08:27:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series