Display:
I can only assume that if they're playing  that card as a surprise then they have others up their sleeves ...
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sat Nov 10th, 2007 at 02:24:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I was just wondering if that was a way of saying "if you're stupid over Iran, you must be aware we're on their side". Do you feel lucky punk ? Well, do ya ?

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sat Nov 10th, 2007 at 02:57:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Or maybe it's this.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Sat Nov 10th, 2007 at 03:02:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Quite possibly, however the chinese have got no chance on that one. Nearly all of the world's pc silicon is made in Taiwan. Absolutely nobody is gonna let the chinese have dibs on that.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sat Nov 10th, 2007 at 03:09:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think the Chinese are satisfied with the status quo right now and will easily wait a few decades before making an overt play for Taiwan.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Sat Nov 10th, 2007 at 03:25:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
and from their actions, if not their rhetoric, i suspect that they are, economic integration will give them the benefits of forced unification without bothering with the death and destruction.

national pride is national pride, but business is king.

by wu ming on Sun Nov 11th, 2007 at 02:57:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
because proactive deterrence is obviously preferable to reactive confrontation -- for everybody.

They have given us some other surprises lately, too:

Chinese Test Anti-Satellite Weapon

China 'hacked' into Pentagon defence system

I think this incident was just an underlining of certain points they probably told Robert Gates in Beijing this last week.  Perhaps something like, "We'll help you put some pressure on Iran, but you'd better lock up your other silly ideas and put them in indefinite storage."

Looks like someone got the message:

But there has been no new buildup of U.S. firepower in the region. In fact there has been some shrinkage in recent months. After adding a second aircraft carrier in the gulf early this year -- a move that Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said was designed to underscore U.S. long-term stakes in the region -- the Navy has quietly returned to a one-carrier presence.

<...>

At the moment, there are few indications of U.S. military leaders either advising offensive action against Iran or taking new steps to prepare for that possibility. Gates has repeatedly emphasized that while military action cannot be ruled out, the focus is on diplomacy and tougher economic sanctions.

The article also confirms that it's the military that has the sanest assessment:

The man whose responsibility it would be to design any conventional military action against Iran -- and execute it if ordered by Bush -- is Adm. William Fallon, the Central Command chief. He is playing down prospects of conflict, saying in a late September interview that there is too much talk of war.

"This constant drumbeat of conflict is what strikes me, which is not helpful and not useful," Fallon told Al-Jazeera television, adding that he does not expect a war against Iran. During a recent tour of the gulf region, Fallon made a point of telling U.S. allies that Iran is not as strong as it portrays itself.

"Not militarily, economically or politically," he said.

Fallon's immediate predecessor, retired Army Gen. John Abizaid, raised eyebrows in September when he suggested that initiating a war against Iran would be a mistake. He urged vigorous efforts to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, but failing that, he said, "There are ways to live with a nuclear Iran." He also said he believed Iran's leaders could be dissuaded from using nuclear arms, once acquired.



Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.
by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Sat Nov 10th, 2007 at 09:05:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series