European Tribune

Display:
That would seem sensible, but the argument used is that the best known candidate and the one with the most money for TV ads would win. There would not be the opportunity for a lesser known candidate to build up support.

There is also special pleading from the smaller states like New Hampshire, that a national primary would ensure that Presidential candidates paid them no attention at all.

by Gary J on Tue Nov 13th, 2007 at 05:04:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
One could also hold the primaries in increasing order of state population, allowing for several primaries to take place simultaneously.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Nov 13th, 2007 at 05:13:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes. You would need laws about advertising spending limits and equal time.

Migeru's proposal might be more pragmatic.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Tue Nov 13th, 2007 at 07:42:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
On Rhetoric
by rg - Dec 3
82 comments

Bugger Thy Neighbour
by redstar - Dec 3
264 comments

Not quite the 'perfect fix'?
by djhabakkuk - Dec 3
4 comments

After Democracy
by marco - Dec 3
44 comments

Dancing in the Streets
by rdf - Dec 4

Me and my son, a Shministim
by shergald - Dec 4
3 comments

Georgia on my mind...[Updated]
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3
22 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 64
by LEP - Dec 4
6 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series