That's exactly what Keynes was saying in The General Theory...
Nevertheless these difficulties are rightly regarded as 'conundrums'. They are 'purely theoretical' in the sense that they never perplex, or indeed enter in any way into, business decisions and have no relevance to the causal sequence of economic events, which are clear-cut and determinate in spite of the quantitative indeterminacy of these concepts. It is natural, therefore, to conclude that they not only lack precision but are unnecessary.
It is natural, therefore, to conclude
Does he go on to say that this natural logic is justified? When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
(In my example, I assumed a businessman was better off understanding the balance sheet all the same...) When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
