European Tribune

Display:
Natural doesn't tell us if Keynes finally validates that conclusion. Does he in fact conclude that such instruments are unnecessary?

(In my example, I assumed a businessman was better off understanding the balance sheet all the same...)

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Nov 20th, 2007 at 03:09:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, he is concluding that (see BruceMcF's statement that Keynes worked with nominal GDP). But Keynes is very vague on the reasons why. The extended quote I gave is the entire argument as far as I can tell. So unless he developed it further in previous books, or it was "widely known" at the time that there were some problems (and what was the consensus back then?) it will be hard to figure out exactly what keynes had in mind.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Nov 20th, 2007 at 03:31:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
LQD: Geoengineering Ranked
by nanne - Nov 19
10 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
28 comments

So I met Bill McKibben
by SacredCowTipper - Nov 20
1 comment

UN: end the 'inhuman' blockade of Gaza
by heathlander - Nov 15
10 comments

Trains in Moravia
by DoDo - Nov 16
72 comments

A Modest Proposal
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 14
116 comments

Agriculture without Fossil Fuels
by SacredCowTipper - Nov 17
1 comment

jitter noise rumble
by emilmoller - Nov 19
18 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series