Display:
the two actions are of a piece.

when a democrat was in a position to expand social welfare spending, greenspan's call for responsibility was meant to forestall it. right wing strategy, same as dole filibustering universal health care in '93-'94.

once bush was in office, he could be trusted not to waste money on the non-rich, so greenspan opened up the floodgates. same strategy, just different tactics in a differnt context.

and when a democrat gets back in power, the money will be gone, and so those social welfare programs will be impossible to fund. game, set match.

by wu ming on Fri Nov 16th, 2007 at 03:50:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You don't seem to realize that serious people just have to feel alarmed when leftists are in power wasting money that isn't theirs to spend.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Nov 16th, 2007 at 04:23:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's a shame, too.  Greenspan could've had, along with Clinton, quite an enviable legacy on the nation's finances.  Nothing radical in change, but a debt-free America would've been pretty nice right about now.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Sat Nov 17th, 2007 at 10:28:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series