Display:
The state board that is planning California's 700-mile high-speed rail system is facing a politically sensitive route decision that could make or break the $40 billion project. The nine-member board of the California High-Speed Rail Authority is scheduled to decide next month how to get the bullet trains through the coastal mountains between the San Joaquin Valley and the San Francisco Bay area, and the debate over the options has become fierce.

The authority is proposing a rail system that would carry passengers between California's largest cities on trains that run at top speeds of more than 200 mph. Supporters see it as an important third option to freeway and air travel as the state's population heads toward 60 million by 2050.

http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_7442992

by asdf on Fri Nov 16th, 2007 at 11:57:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Its when the transport tasks and the politics get tangled up that we get to the cross your fingers and hope stage.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Nov 17th, 2007 at 12:44:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
as it would bring it closer to sacramento, and thus within a hop, skip and a jump from where i am. ther southern route will leave the capital region out of the loop awaiting a "to be built later" spur line.
by wu ming on Sat Nov 17th, 2007 at 04:00:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... and I agree ... both for how the layout works regionally and for how the layout works for inter-regional connections.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sun Nov 18th, 2007 at 11:28:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series