Display:
Yes, good summary but correct the typo, it was in 1975,
not 1974 that the constitutional crisis occurred. The one thing to add, is that there is a fair bit of anger
over the Coalition weakening industrial labor protection
and rumors that despite protestations to the contrary, they intend to weaken them further should they be elected.
by core halo on Wed Nov 21st, 2007 at 11:49:04 AM EST
Thanks for the correction.

I have not gone into the issues raised in the campaign, but I agree that the coalition plans to "reform" employment law has been prominent in the campaign.

by Gary J on Wed Nov 21st, 2007 at 01:36:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
... may well be a victim of their own success in the previous election, when they in effect gained the balance of power in the Australian Senate, which allowed them to put the new Industrial Relations laws through.

In other words, it seems as if the effectiveness of the Senate as the "House of Review" when neither main party has a controlling majority in the Senate saved the Coalition from "having" to actually implement the things it always said it wanted to do ... seizing the opportunity offered by holding the effective balance of power in the Senate made it seem the more ideological of the two parties, and made Labor's (long-standing) critique of the series of government IR reforms seem more middle of the road.

At that to the government's long-standing refusal to ratify the Kyoto agreement that it signed, and the general impression that the new Labor leader gives of being a "safe pair of hands", and it seems very much like a change of government is in the offing.


Utsukushikereba sore de ii

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Wed Nov 21st, 2007 at 10:04:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series
Agriculture
by afew - Sep 2

Anglo Disease
by Migeru - Sep 2