But your photos are mostly around 23kb, none more than 30 or so so you can afford to compress them less that you do.
Maybe somebody with a mac can help out - Ted perhaps? Ad astra per aspera
But I suggest as a first excercise to take one single image (I'd take "autumn colours, perugia 1") and do 2-3 further versions with the same size but decreasing compression, and post them in a comment -- for us to comment :-) (We frontpagers can delete it later.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
Save as JPG.
Flickr shouldn't do too much damage after that.
that's what scoop wants to do with the flickr capture, without me coding any size. in preview it's a bit less grainy. before i was asking it to make it 600 width.
in iphoto, which i use to suck the pix out of the flashcard in the camera, the pic comes out bigger and more luminous. if i drag them into mail to send to someone, they come out big and lively.
the camera is a samsung techwin, s1000 model.
i don't understand why with the same settings one pic weighs 167k, and another weighs 4.9mb...
anyone enlighten me? ~"When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate." Karl Jung~
that's what scoop wants to do with the flickr capture
Is "scoop" some Apple program?
I don't use mac, but here is an idea: maybe what "flickr capture" does is screen-capture your photos, as loaded by iphoto into a small viewing window?
At any rate, I hope the Apple users here suggest you some good image-editing program, so that you control what's re-sized not FlickrExport/iphoto. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
I checked on the pixellated pictures, and understood the problem : you are linking to the flickr thumbnails images (with an _m.jpg at the end of the name of the picture). Remove those _m, and the pictures will appear correctly... Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
