Display:
A longer view which isn't given by GNI or GDP, surely?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Thu Nov 29th, 2007 at 07:22:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I could invest 45% of my income - or none. In several years, the consequences will be very different, but I still have the same GNI or GDP today.
by Sargon on Thu Nov 29th, 2007 at 07:41:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sorry, are you praising GNI/GDP as a measure or damning it? Or are you reading me as supporting GNI in the face of GDP? Or are the anti-biotics just confuddling me completely?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Thu Nov 29th, 2007 at 07:59:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
a) I'm saying that GNI is better than GDP, in my view, and don't understand why HDI isn't using it instead.

b) as ultimately material well-being is related to consumption, this is the measure that should be used - the integral of it over time, anyway.

c) it's very easy to damn GDP but hard to come up with viable alternatives that could be used in all countries, that's why it's used despite the shortcomings. Just like the democracy, you see.

by Sargon on Thu Nov 29th, 2007 at 08:13:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
a. Sounds reasonable.

b. I could go for the integral of GNI as telling us something more useful.

c. I'm not convinced that hiding the subtleties of reality behind a single index is going to tell us a damn thing. To that extent, HDI is just as intrinsically flawed as GDP - neither mean anything much out of context.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Thu Nov 29th, 2007 at 08:27:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series
Agriculture
by afew - Sep 2

Anglo Disease
by Migeru - Sep 2