Display:
I agree, and I have read many of the pieces you speak of. The real questions are these:

-How deep is the infection? I think the patient still has levels of resistance. Hansen, at NASA is a good example. The focus was on politically useful slots- the rest seem to have been muzzled, but not "liquidated".  If that were not the case, it would be a terminal disease. It may still be:

-Do the democratic doctors truly want to do the surgery needed?

I worry more about that-- I don't see it. Hillary will keep the bases in Iraq, --and the stolen oil.  If she does, she must keep the empire, and empire and a democratic republic are mutually exclusive.

Useful talking follows experience, the more experience the better. Talking that precedes experience is known as bullshit.

by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Sun Dec 2nd, 2007 at 05:57:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
How deep is the infection? I've heard that it goes down five or six layers into the bureaucracy. That's pretty deep and enough to cause fundamental change in the way a department functions.

As to your other question, je ne sais pas.

I fear that the bases in Iraq will stay, just as a function of inertia. Once the massive machinery lumbers into activity, it's very hard to turn it aside or, especially, to undo what's been done. That will/would require massive amounts of change, and barring externally-imposed disaster, I'm not sure the comfortable American body politic is up to confronting that.

by Mnemosyne on Mon Dec 3rd, 2007 at 07:29:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series