European Tribune

Display:
As far as I know, this is taken care of in definitions, usually they count people who performed at least x hours of paid labour in the previous month, or something like it. If anything, I suspect a problem on the other side: people with very part-time jobs that do appear in the statistics as employed.

Both from your comment and the and the OP, it seems some part of America's higher employment rates is in jobs that are not particularly productive, nor really wanted very much by their participants.

On the other hand, all this data massaging still leaves France with real lower employment rates for young and old people. Especially the old part must include serious numbers of people willing and able to work who can't find it. That's a poblem no matter how you measure it.

by GreatZamfir on Fri Nov 30th, 2007 at 09:46:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's not a problem I'm trying to avoid. I say so clearly concerning the 55-plus group. Concerning the younger group, there's less employment because more (of the 16-19 group, especially) are in school. Meanwhile, as you say, short part-time (the rule is one hour only of paid work in the reference week) creates employment numbers and muddies the waters.

I object to the term "data massaging" however. I don't think I'm doing anything the "specialists" don't do all the time, knowing that they are creating headline statistics that will be used by different links in the info and media chain to reinforce a world view. One in which the "free market economies" have proved that their way is not only the best but inevitable.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Nov 30th, 2007 at 10:27:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series